|
Name: Ostarine
Type: Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM)
AKA: MK-2866, Enobosarm
|
|
II. Natural Derivative
Synthetic substance, no natural derivative
 |
|
III. Chemical Profile (IUPAC name)
|
|
IV. History
Ostarine, also known as MK-2866 or Enobosarm, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) developed to treat muscle wasting and osteoporosis. It has gained popularity in the fitness community for its muscle-building and fat-reducing properties.
|
|
V. Legal Information
Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), is often regulated under analog laws due to its potential for misuse in sports. In the US, its status is restrictive, and it may be controlled under the Federal Analog Act if deemed similar to other controlled substances.
Key US Federal Policies:
Ostarine is regulated as an investigational new drug under the FDA's regulatory framework. It is not legally available for human use outside of clinical trials.
|
|
VI. Physical Effects
Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), enhances muscle growth and physical performance. As an upper, it improves muscle mass and strength. Short-term effects include increased physical performance, while long-term use may lead to hormonal imbalances and cardiovascular issues. Overdose risks involve severe health complications. Safe dosing involves careful monitoring. Recent research focuses on its effectiveness in muscle growth and potential side effects.  |
|
VII. Psychological Effects
Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator, impacts mood and aggression through androgen receptors. Immediate effects include mood enhancement and increased aggression, with long-term use potentially causing psychological issues and cognitive impairments. Research focuses on its effects on mental health and overall safety.
 |
|
VIII. Culture
Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), was developed in the early 21st century. Its cultural impact involves its use in bodybuilding and athletic performance enhancement. Proponents argue for its muscle-building benefits, while opponents focus on potential health risks and ethical concerns in sports. Its use is primarily in athletic contexts, reflecting broader debates about performance enhancement.
 |